<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentarii pentru: Raoul Dufy vs. Edward Munch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artcritic.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/raoul-dufy-vs-edward-munch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artcritic.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/raoul-dufy-vs-edward-munch/</link>
	<description>"Munceşte ca un sclav, porunceşte ca un rege, crează ca un zeu"     -  Constantin Brâncuşi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>de: DoraMaar</title>
		<link>http://artcritic.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/raoul-dufy-vs-edward-munch/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>DoraMaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artcritic.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Da, Munch a pornit de la impresionism, curent care nu i-a permis suficient sa se exprime , avea nevoie de mai multa emotie si energie in lucrarile lui asa ca a ajuns sa se dezvolte ca expresionist. Imi place Munch pentru ca imi place expresionusmul in arta in general. Duffy se inscrie in perioada &quot;fauve&quot; ceea ce nu inseamna ca imi displace. Totusi MUNCH este alegerea mea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Da, Munch a pornit de la impresionism, curent care nu i-a permis suficient sa se exprime , avea nevoie de mai multa emotie si energie in lucrarile lui asa ca a ajuns sa se dezvolte ca expresionist. Imi place Munch pentru ca imi place expresionusmul in arta in general. Duffy se inscrie in perioada &#8220;fauve&#8221; ceea ce nu inseamna ca imi displace. Totusi MUNCH este alegerea mea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>de: artcritic</title>
		<link>http://artcritic.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/raoul-dufy-vs-edward-munch/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>artcritic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artcritic.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Ok, poate ai dreptate. Dar eu am spus ca au pornit de la acelasi stil, impresionismul, pe care l-au abordat in tinerete si de care au fost influentati. Normal ca nu sunt impresionisti. 
Nu cred insa ca se pot gasi diferente la fel de mari intre artisti ai renasterii sau ai barocului. Poate daca imi zici tu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, poate ai dreptate. Dar eu am spus ca au pornit de la acelasi stil, impresionismul, pe care l-au abordat in tinerete si de care au fost influentati. Normal ca nu sunt impresionisti.<br />
Nu cred insa ca se pot gasi diferente la fel de mari intre artisti ai renasterii sau ai barocului. Poate daca imi zici tu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>de: Voica</title>
		<link>http://artcritic.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/raoul-dufy-vs-edward-munch/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Voica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artcritic.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Desi mi-au surprins in mod placut alegerile tale in general, aceasta comparatie trebuie sa iti zic - mi se pare cam neinspirata. Cei doi au fost intr-adevar contemporani dar nu au apartinut in nici un caz aceluiasi still (iar acesta nu este in nici un caz impresionismul!). Diferente la fel de mari se pot gasi intre artisti ai Renasterii sau ai Barocului din diferite tari - o chestie ce tine de cultura nationala si experienta personala. Diferentele acestea pot fi mai interesant de dezbatut, mai ales in cazul Renasterii (care nu se vrea a fi deloc nationala) dar o comparatie intre un Fauve francez si un expresionist nordic e o batalie pierduta! 
Scuze daca am batut campul prea mult, si ca sa iti raspund totusi la intrebare adevarul meu este Munch. (Pot si argumenta, dar nu pare a fi momentul)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desi mi-au surprins in mod placut alegerile tale in general, aceasta comparatie trebuie sa iti zic &#8211; mi se pare cam neinspirata. Cei doi au fost intr-adevar contemporani dar nu au apartinut in nici un caz aceluiasi still (iar acesta nu este in nici un caz impresionismul!). Diferente la fel de mari se pot gasi intre artisti ai Renasterii sau ai Barocului din diferite tari &#8211; o chestie ce tine de cultura nationala si experienta personala. Diferentele acestea pot fi mai interesant de dezbatut, mai ales in cazul Renasterii (care nu se vrea a fi deloc nationala) dar o comparatie intre un Fauve francez si un expresionist nordic e o batalie pierduta!<br />
Scuze daca am batut campul prea mult, si ca sa iti raspund totusi la intrebare adevarul meu este Munch. (Pot si argumenta, dar nu pare a fi momentul)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>de: artcritic</title>
		<link>http://artcritic.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/raoul-dufy-vs-edward-munch/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>artcritic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artcritic.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-24</guid>
		<description>The point is that they are 2 completely different painters altough they lived in the same period and are both part of the same curent. That&#039;s why I made you pick one of them :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is that they are 2 completely different painters altough they lived in the same period and are both part of the same curent. That&#8217;s why I made you pick one of them <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>de: Magherafelt</title>
		<link>http://artcritic.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/raoul-dufy-vs-edward-munch/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Magherafelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artcritic.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit.

cheers, Magherafelt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyway &#8230; nice blog to visit.</p>
<p>cheers, Magherafelt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>de: -X-</title>
		<link>http://artcritic.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/raoul-dufy-vs-edward-munch/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>-X-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artcritic.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Edward Munch ... tablourile lui sunt impregnate de o forta care  da sa irupa :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward Munch &#8230; tablourile lui sunt impregnate de o forta care  da sa irupa <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
